Jeremy Gschwendtner vs Alexander Frusina Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Frusina's recent second serve performance sees him winning 38.24% of points, while Gschwendtner wins 47.31%. What does this suggest? Gschwendtner holds a notable edge in retaining points on second serves.
• In return games, Frusina captures 42.5% of points on their opponent's second serve, compared to Gschwendtner's 46.23%. On first serve returns, Frusina shows a 22.73% success rate versus Gschwendtner's 31.09%, highlighting Gschwendtner's stronger return capability.
• Under pressure, Frusina has saved 35.29% of break points, whereas Gschwendtner has saved 51.68%. This indicates Gschwendtner's greater resilience when facing break points.
• In the past year, Frusina has won 14.29% of his matches, in contrast to Gschwendtner's 61.82%. Consider this: Gschwendtner's consistent match wins suggest greater overall performance.
• Analyzing surface preference, both players have their best records on clay, with Frusina at 29% and Gschwendtner at 58%. Gschwendtner's superior clay court performance is evident here.
• When evaluating player levels, Frusina has faced opponents with an average rank of 172.29, slightly tougher than Gschwendtner's average opponent rank of 181.07, despite Gschwendtner's better win percentage.
• If the match goes to a deciding set, Frusina has failed to win any over the last year, while Gschwendtner has secured victories in 54% of them, indicating a stronger finish by Gschwendtner.
• Frusina has converted 50% of break point opportunities. However, Gschwendtner, with 30.93% conversion, slightly trails in this area. Yet, Gschwendtner's overall match performance might balance this out.

Editorial Prediction (July 16, 2025, UTC):

The performance trends between Frusina and Gschwendtner set the stage for a competitive matchup, yet distinct differences give Gschwendtner the strategic upper hand.

The data shows Gschwendtner not only excels in maintaining a robust second serve success rate but also surpasses Frusina in return game proficiency, particularly against first serves. These aspects significantly favor him in baseline rallies and key points.

Moreover, Gschwendtner demonstrates superior break point defense under pressure and consistently outperforms Frusina in match-winning percentages over the past year, reflecting a more consistent and reliable player.

Although both players exhibit their clay court prowess, Gschwendtner shines with a markedly better win rate, further strengthening his potential for success given the playing surface.

In summary, considering the aggregated performance metrics and current form, Gschwendtner emerges as the probable victor in this upcoming encounter.